Prime Minister: British System of Government

boot minister of religion British System of G everywherenmentINTRODUCTIONThis leaven mirrors the positions of the anthesis Ministers and their console members, and discusses how dominant the role of outpouring Minister is in the British arranging of Government, and to what extent fundament the power be exercised. The sample begins with a vivid explanation of what the core executive arm of the British establishment is do up of, what position the primordial Minister stands for in the melody of coordinating the affairs of the well(p)-meaning British citizens. Moreover, on the opposite hand, this essay seeks to address the roles Prime Ministers have played in the Civil dish and the changes they have effected in the preceding(a) decades. The next point go away describe, comp atomic number 18 and contrast the leadership styles of some dignitaries who have served in the subject matter of a Prime Minister to the British presidency in the twentieth century to the present Leader Gordon Brown. The next important area this essay will address includes historical decisions former Prime Ministers have make in shaping the British polity and policy formulation. We will retrieve our discussion with a brief consideration of the structure of the British dodging of government and gladly guide our discussion into the roles and powers of the Prime Minister in the affairs of the government.THE BRITISH SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENTThe British system of government is known to be Europes oldest parliamentary democracy. The British parliament was established in the eleventh century and, after King John signed the Magna Charta in the year 1215, it came into power and became the main figure in the British system of government. By this singular act, England piloted the idea of democracy in the whole of Europe. The British constitution, unlike that of most of other countries in Europe and the world at large, is not written as a single document. It is partly make by statute, and partly by common law and conventions respectively. The constitution tummy be altered by an Act of Parliament, and/or by prevalent agreement to change convention(s) (Coxall et al, 2003179-181 2006 182-189 Kavanagh 2006 247-250).Britain is a intact monarchy and currently has her over-embellished stateliness Queen Elizabeth II as the head of state. Practically, she reigns but does not rule. The expanse is administered, in the queens name, by the Government comprising of a body of ministers, which is referred to as the Cabinet and consists of 22 leading ministers, who are responsible to carrying out parliamentary functions. The origin, traditions, customs and beliefs of the Great Britain are derived from its four countries (England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland). Each of these countries is well represented in the British Parliament, which sits at Westminster (at the heart of London) this is the ultimate legislative authority in the kingdom. The Parliament is compose d of three arms the Sovereign, the category of Lords, and the tin of Commons (Coxall et al, 2003182-186 2006 185-190 Kavanagh 2006 247-250).In practice, the Sovereign arm authorisedly bidding and dissolves the Parliament and broadly begins every new yearly assembly with a speech from the throne. The firm of Lords consists of traditionally inherited peers and peeresses, which similarly includes the law Lords. They are so appointed to undertake the judicial duties of the House, and the Lords Spiritual (made up of the Archbishops of Canterbury and York and other 24 bishops). On the other hand, the House of Commons is elected by universal adult suffrage and made up of Members of Parliament (MPs) in that location are approximately 650 seats for the MPs. The chief responsible officer of the House is the Speaker, who is elected by the MPs to take charge of the affairs of the sign of the zodiac and presides over the house meetings. The ultimate authority for law qualification resi des in the House of Commons (Coxall et al. 2006 185-188 Kavanagh 2006 250-251).Every five years, a general pick must(prenominal) be conducted only citizens who are eighteen (18) years of age and preceding(prenominal) are allowed to participate in the voting exercise and candidates for various electoral positions must be over 21. There are four major(ip) policy-making parties, namely Social Democratic, Labour, Liberal, and Conservative parties The winning ships company forms the Government. Ministers are chosen by the Prime Minister (leader of winning party). The second party becomes official impedance to the ruling party and forms the Shadow-Cabinet. MPs who are members of the Opposition blocs are called back-benchers.THE PRIME MINISTERIn modern era, the United Kingdoms Prime Ministers lead a major policy-making party, and command a volume in the House of Commons (the Legislative arm), who is also the leader of the Cabinet (the Executive arm). However, it should be noted that under the British system of government, in that respect is a unity of powers rather than separation.The Premiership was not deliberately created as an official position, but has however, evolved into a much structured official power. The office in stages evolved over three hundred years, and defined by customs in the form of conventions that later became more often than not accepted by everyone. The Prime Ministers alliance with the Sovereign, Parliament and Cabinet was completely defined by these conventions until the twentieth century. condescension its growing supremacy in the constitutional chain of command, the Premiership was accorded with little ballock recognition the legal imaginary tale upheld was that the Sovereign noneffervescent governed directly. For example, more of the Prime Ministers legislative and powers are largely derived from Royal sanctions and are tranquilize formally vested in the Head of State the Sovereign (Coxall et al, 2003180-182 2006 18 5-190 Kavanagh 2006 247-250).Under this arrangement, UK appears to feature two independent executives the Prime Minister and the Sovereign. However, the notion of the crown settles this paradox. The Royal Crown stands as a symbol of the states authority to govern making laws and executing them, imposing revenue enhancementes and collecting them, declaring war and making peace. Until the Glorious change of 1688, the Sovereign had worn the Crown and exercised the powers it stands for. Thereafter, Parliament gradually took Sovereigns out of the corridor of political powers to a more neutral position. Parliament placed the Crown in commission, thereby entrusting its authority to responsible Ministers including the Prime Minister and the Cabinet crew, who are made accountable for their policies and actions to the Parliament and the stack Great Britain. Nevertheless, the Sovereign still wears the Crown and her sanction powers are still legally intact in practice, Parliament has take n everyday governance from her, leaving her with three constitutional proficients to be kept informed, to advise, and to warn (Coxall et al. 2006 185-188 Kavanagh 2006 247-250).The Prime Minister is responsible for recommendations of dignitaries for whiteness in the various annual special honours lists. The Prime Minister has a distinctive role in the area of national gage being the national leader, the PM represents the country at global events, much(prenominal) as, playing host to heads of government of other countries and international conferences, (Coxall et al, 2003187-189 2006 182-202). The PM also appoints top civil servants.Dating back to the late seventies, it is gathered that quite a a lot of key reforms of the civil service has evolved. Margaret Thatcher (the then Prime Minister) highly scrutinised the civil service commission her civil servant reforms meant making the civil servants more efficient. This effectively reduced the numbers of civil servants in office. Th e Blair government also continued with this reform. This reform was, however, formally initiated by the forward Conservative government, (Martin 200369-70). Notwithstanding, the leadership styles of Prime Ministers have varied historically. Thatcher is famous with having a dominant leadership style in which she had a direct approach, however, the political writer Martin J Smith has described her leadership style as being autocratic.Generally, the Prime Minister seeks advice from the Chancellor of the Exchequer and treasury to begin with economic, foreign policy proposal are made, nevertheless, the final decisions are made by the PM who is central in shaping policies. Over the past forty-five years in the UK government, Prime Ministers had to take an important role in various schemes bothering the different quarters of the economy such as challenges facing the industrial trade unions and issues in Northern Ireland. On the other hand, PMs might delve into areas they fervently believ e in, which might sometimes risk being displeasing to other ministers. For example while Margaret Thatcher bought in the poll tax, James Callaghan the PM during the late seventies intervened in educational and health matters, however, Tony Blair, on his opinion, put into operation the millennium dome, had an enthusiastic sideline in law and order and geted President Bush in the Iraq war. Gordon Brown has made several decisions (such as closing the gaps that exits in the tax haven) that he believes will lead his people out of the current fiscal crisis.The PM has the power to advise the monarch the arrangement of disbandment of parliament in spite of appearance a five-year period. This strengthens the PMs authority against the oppositional parties however this political weapon can sometimes flop, for instances James Callaghan in failing to call for a general election in 1978, while his predecessor Edward Heath called an election in 1974, can mean defeat. Final decisions on election dates are generally made after proper consultations with chief whips and console have been initiated. Historically, British Prime Ministers possess distinctive responsibilities to discharge healthy governance to the people of Great Britain, notably in world wars and recent crisis like buns and mouth and fuel crisis. Prime Ministers importantly must govern in a democratic way, by getting a consensus if they are to do well in office.The support of the party gives the prime minister the right and influence to carry out their duties, relationships within the party are prevailing and are two way. The relationships the PM has between cabinet ministers and close associates do not necessary have to do with personally as generally they are part of a structural relationship which is linked by the rules of the Whitehall circle, which are made up of institutions of governments, past policy decisions and by orthogonal political and economic matters. Cabinet ministers and the prime minister have resources for sale to them however, to achieve this they have to go through a process of exchange. This clearly has to do with the particular framework, which the prime minister would have achieved on the election result, if the PM were unpopular in the polls, and then they become more reliant on others for advice (Coxall et al 2003 187-193 2006 182-202). A prime minister has the most authority after an election victory.CONCLUSIONThe PM achieves little or nothing in office if they do not have the support of their cabinet ministers. Furthermore, the Prime Minister being in office is based on legitimacy hence, the PM is reliant on the cabinet. Tony Blair, being aware of how support is vital, owed his position, in many ways, to Browns loyalty. In return, Blair has given Gordon Brown the authority and indecorum to administer the governments socio-economic policies/affairs. Although, Blairs leadership style making of executive decisions which he (Blair) feels is crush for the c ountry irrespective of what the bulk of the cabinet members think is more hypernym to Browns. In conclusion, British Prime Ministers are clearly in a powerful position of authority in the British system of government, which has evolved over time.REFERENCESCoxall B., Robins L., and Leach R. (2006) British Politics. Palgrave Macmillan.Coxall B., Robins L., and Leach R. (2003) Contemporary British Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, 4th ed.Kavanagh D. (1996) British Politics Continuities and Change. Oxford University Press, 3rd ed.Kavanagh D. (2006) British Politics Continuities and Change. Oxford University Press, 6th ed.Martin J. S. (2003) Governing as New Labour. Palgrave Macmillan