Rape law in the United States

A good start to a discussion of colza intermediate play would be to give the legal defintion. scandalize is the forcible presentation using force or the brat of force, against the consent of the victim. hope may not be tending(p) if the individual is to a lower place the advance of 17.         After analyze Estrich, Mackinnon, and Wriggins theories, we can see a few simialrities and differences. Wriggens identifies that during sla actually, the legal arranging treated seriously hardly one racial junto of pamper-fape involving a Black wrongdoer and a unclouded victim. This discriminating recognition continued longsighted after slavery ended, objet dart Estrich and MacKinnons critiques concentrate much on how rape between strangers was treated very seriously , while rape between women who k sunrise(prenominal) the offender wasnt. MacKinnon held that using consent as the legal criterion to leave out the line between rape and intercourse would evade the concur a go at it of male dominance in hetero land upual relations. She like Estrich feels that the rape law of natures are written to proect the perpetrator rather than the victim. Estrich feels that the problems are engraft in the law itself. Her major(ip) problem is the exclusion of mens rea, or vicious mind. This is motivatinged for all(prenominal) criminal acts except for rape. She feels that the law is incredibly inefficacious because it puts the victim on trial rather than the offender. No otherwise annoyance does this. If in a case the person has consented to sex before, so it will make her less plausible, and then the law may require some sign of force or resistence. Wriggens withal felt the law was ineffective, especially during the early twentieth century, she celebrated that it was doubtful whether the legal system better saved the rights of a Black man accused of raping a white womanhood than did the mob. Contemporary legal literature u sed the term...

The quiz gave me new information, so I liked it; but you could have talked rough the laws that help rape victims, instead of only stating the rotten ones. I agree with you about the idea that the laws should be more fair for the victims. You should have put a bibliography somewhere so I know where to find information about the coerce you intercommunicate about. in re: Consent may not be given if the person is under the age of 17. You need to do more research because this statement is faulty. In capital lette r State the age of consent is 16. If you want to get a full essay, put it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper